<html><body>
<p><tt><font size="2">Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> wrote on 05/08/2015 03:41:54 PM:<br>
<br>
> From: Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, Matt Harbison <mharbison@attotech.com>, </font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Cc: matt_harbison@yahoo.com, mercurial-devel@selenic.com</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Date: 05/08/2015 03:43 PM</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Subject: Re: [PATCH] test-histedit: fix HGEDITOR for Windows</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> On 05/06/2015 03:30 PM, Matt Mackall wrote:<br>
> > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 12:32 -0400, Matt Harbison wrote:<br>
> >> # HG changeset patch<br>
> >> # User Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com><br>
> >> # Date 1430929086 14400<br>
> >> # Wed May 06 12:18:06 2015 -0400<br>
> >> # Node ID 217c94fbe75cb14c3a38e41522a83729ad8d90ea<br>
> >> # Parent c5d4f9cc8da7bb2068457e96e4f74ff694514ced<br>
> >> test-histedit: fix HGEDITOR for Windows<br>
> ><br>
> > Looks like this is equivalent to Durham's fix for vfat.<br>
> <br>
> Which mean this looks good to you?<br>
> Or should a different approach should be used?<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> -- <br>
> Pierre-Yves David<br>
</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">Durham's fix was better, and pulled in yesterday I think. I just didn't see it on the ML before sending this.</font></tt></body></html>