I think we have a winner - thank you :) "hg since -r N" is the same thing as "hg log -P N -r 0:"<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Matt Mackall <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mpm@selenic.com">mpm@selenic.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 20:28 -0600, Augie Fackler wrote:<br>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, CG Linden <<a href="mailto:cg@lindenlab.com">cg@lindenlab.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> > Wouldn't 1.3 be an ancestor of 1.3.1? or do you transplant?<br>
><br>
> 1.3 is an ancestor of 1.3.1, but work has been done in main that<br>
> didn't go into stable - thus there are revisions in soon-to-be-1.4<br>
> that are not descendants of 1.3.1, but it'd still be nice to see them<br>
> with since.<br>
<br>
</div>Looks like a good time to mention the --prune flag to log. For instance,<br>
here's how to find everything new that's going to show up in 1.4:<br>
<br>
hg log -P 1.3.1 -M -r 0: --template "{desc|firstline}\n"<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
<a href="http://selenic.com" target="_blank">http://selenic.com</a> : development and support for Mercurial and Linux<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>